Why the study?
Does potassium current blockade (IKr and IKs) induce early after depolarizations in the setting of sodium current blockade in a mammalian ventricular action potential model?
Does potassium current blockade (IKr and IKs) induce early after depolarizations in the setting of sodium current blockade in a mammalian ventricular action potential model?
Computational modeling demonstrates that sodium current blockade lowers the threshold of potassium current blockade required to induce early after depolarizations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May lower EAD thresholds with multichannel blockade in models; hypothesis-generating and should not change clinical practice.
HYPOTHESIS: We sought to model different degrees blockade of the IKr and IKs in the setting of mild to moderate INa blockade and to study its relationship to the induction of EADs METHODS: We used the cese 1.4.5 platform to run Luo-Rudy Model II of mammalian ventricular action potential. We applied a range of blockade levels to the INa (scaling factor of 50–100%). Then we paced the cell for 5 minutes at a cycle length of 2000 ms to reach steady state before each adjustment of the scaling factors for the IKr or Iks. We adjusted the blockade scale of each current by steps of 1–10% and looked for occurrence of EADs. RESULTS: At each level of blockade of IKs there was a “critical level” of blockade of IKr after which the EADs started occurring and vice versa. At mild to moderate levels of INa blockade there is a linear relationship between the minimum levels of IKs and IKr blockade at which EADs occur. When INa is blocked, EADs needed lesser degree of potassium currents blockade to occur.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moukabary et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: