Key result
High-altitude mountain sports linked to ~3-fold greater symptom relief in mental versus somatic disorders.
Why the study?
Mountain sports at high altitude are gaining popularity, but little is known about the effect of these activities on mental health.
Does performing mountain sports at high altitude improve symptoms in individuals with pre-existing mental disorders compared to those with somatic disorders?
Cross-Sectional (n=323)
Does performing mountain sports at high altitude improve symptoms in individuals with pre-existing mental disorders compared to those with somatic disorders?
Absolute Event Rate: 44.7% vs 14.7%
p-value: p=0.017
Individuals with mental disorders frequently report improved mental health during mountain sports at high altitude, though they rarely inform tour partners or physicians about their condition.
Reports of symptom relief should not yet change practice; leaves open benefits of high-altitude sports for mental disorders pending trials.
Gstir, Claudia, Timo Schurr, Roxana Ehlers, Johannes Burtscher, Barbara Sperner-Unterweger, and Katharina Hüfner. Is it possible for individuals with pre-existing mental disorders to perform mountain sports at high altitude—first evidence from a pilot cross-sectional questionnaire study. High Alt Med Biol. 26:118–128, 2025. Introduction: Mountain sports at high altitude (HA) are gaining increasing popularity, but little is known about the effect of such activities on mental health, despite a great prevalence of mental disorders. Methods: Data were collected using an online self-report questionnaire assessing mental and somatic disorders in individuals performing mountain sports at HA (>2,500 m above sea level [ASL]) as well as their symptom change. Nonparametric tests were used for analyses. Results: 251 individuals without pre-existing disorders (noD), 34 with somatic disorders (somaD), and 38 with mental disorders (mentalD; mainly depressive, eating, and anxiety disorders) participated in this study. Overall, 44.7% of the mentalD group compared with 14.7% of somaD experienced ameliorated symptoms during mountain sports at HA, while 2.6% and 8.8%, respectively, reported a worsening (χ 2 [2] =8.13, p = 0.017). People in the mentalD compared with somaD group significantly less frequently inform tour partners (41.9% vs. 90.9%; χ 2 [2]=16.69, p < 0.001) about their condition or consult their physician (2.6% vs. 26.5%; χ 2 [1]=8.53, p = 0.003) regarding their plans to perform mountain sports at HA. 14.5% of all participants reported mental symptoms at 2,500–3,500 m ASL, 23.5% between >3,500–5,500 m ASL and 31.8% >5,500 m ASL. Conclusion: Individuals with mental disorders often report improved mental health during mountain sports at HA, possibly due to a combination of physical activity, the alpine natural environment, and/or moderate hypoxia. The fact that tour partners and physicians are rarely informed shows the need to reduce the stigma of mental disorders in the mountain sports community. The study was prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00024949).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gstir et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Mental and somatic disorders (n=323). Mountain sports at high altitude vs. Individuals with somatic disorders was evaluated on Ameliorated symptoms during mountain sports at high altitude (p=0.017). During mountain sports at high altitude, individuals with mental disorders reported ameliorated symptoms significantly more often than those with somatic disorders (44.7% vs. 14.7%; p=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: