Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates a functional screening tool improving outcomes in adults with intellectual disabilities, suggesting efficient screening practices.
BACKGROUND: The dynamic nature of intellectual disability necessitates repeated screening. METHOD: The functional screening tool (FST-ID) for individuals with intellectual disabilities was carefully constructed. RESULTS: The FST-ID General Adaptive Composite score (GAC) runs between 0 and 68 points. Criterion validity-high-positive correlations were found between FST-ID and ABAS-II (Gold standard), and between the severity of the intellectual disability and the FST-ID (r = 0.78, p < .001). The scale holds high-internal consistency and intra- and inter-rater reliability values. The cut-off point between mild and moderate disability is 50.4 (Sensitivity: 87%, Specificity 86%, p < .001) and 29.4 between moderate to severe-profound (Sensitivity: 96%, Specificity 94%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The FST-ID presents high-psychometric properties and requires less than 5 min to complete. Using this tool may support efficient screening practices and improved supports for adults with intellectual disability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐David et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: