Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The continuous wavelet transform of Schwartz tempered distributions is investigated and derive the corresponding wavelet inversion formula (valid modulo a constant-tempered distribution) interpreting convergence in S'(\ R). But uniqueness theorem for the present wavelet inversion formula is valid for the space S'F(\ R) obtained by filtering (deleting) (i) all non-zero constant distributions from the space S'(\ R), (ii) all non-zero constants that appear with a distribution as a union. As an example, in considering the distribution x² \ 1 + x² = 1 - 1 \ 1 + x² we would omit 1 and retain only - 1 \ 1 + x². The wavelet kernel under consideration for determining the wavelet transform are those wavelets whose all the moments are non-zero. As an example, (1 + kx - 2x²)e^ - x² is such a wavelet. k is an arbitrary constant. There exist many other classes of such wavelets. In our analysis, we do not use a wavelet kernel having any of its moments zero.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pandey et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: