Key result
Femoral waveforms yield ~96% optimal quality signals for ultra-short HRV, outperforming carotid waveforms.
Why the study?
The comparative precision of carotid versus femoral arterial waveforms to measure ultra-short term heart rate variability following traumatic injury had not been investigated.
Does femoral arterial waveform measurement improve the reliability of ultra-short term heart rate variability derivation compared to carotid arterial waveform measurement in injured British servicemen?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Blinded
No
Does femoral arterial waveform measurement improve the reliability of ultra-short term heart rate variability derivation compared to carotid arterial waveform measurement in injured British servicemen?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.3% vs 63.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Femoral arterial waveforms provide a more reliable signal than carotid waveforms for deriving ultra-short term heart rate variability in patients with combat-related traumatic injury.
Supports femoral over carotid waveforms for reliable ultra-short HRV in trauma; hypothesis-generating for validation and broader use.
In this study, the comparative precision of carotid versus femoral arterial waveforms to measure ultra-short term heart rate variability (HRVUST) following traumatic injury was investigated for the first time. This was an inter-rater reliability study of 50 British servicemen (aged 23-44 years) with non-acute combat-related traumatic injury (CRTI). Paired continuous arterial waveform data for HRVUST analysis, were simultaneously sampled at the carotid and femoral arterial sites (14-16 seconds) during pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement. HRVUST was reported as the root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD). Following the determination of the superior sampling site (carotid versus femoral), the blinded inter-rater agreement in RMSSD for the preferred site was quantified using the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot. The mean age of participants was 34.06±4.88 years. The femoral site was superior to the carotid site with a significantly higher number of reliable signals obtained (Fisher's Exact test; p<0.001). The inter-rater agreement in femoral-derived RMSSD was excellent [ICC 0.99 (95%CI: 0.994-0.997)] with a moderate level of agreement (mean difference [bias]: 0.55; 95% CI: -0.13-1.24 ms). In this study, we demonstrated that the femoral artery is a more reliable site than the carotid artery for HRVUST measurement and post-trauma risk stratification following CRTI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maqsood et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-acute combat-related traumatic injury (n=50). Femoral arterial waveform vs. Carotid arterial waveform was evaluated on Proportion of optimal quality waveforms (p=<0.001). Femoral arterial waveforms yielded a significantly higher proportion of optimal quality signals for ultra-short term heart rate variability measurement compared to carotid waveforms (96.3% vs 63.8%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: