Key result
The MT-MACS technique provided multi-contrast and water-fat imaging with excellent image quality and demonstrated good to excellent agreement with conventional 2D references for myocardial wall thickness and LVEF quantification.
Why the study?
To extend the MT-MACS technique with larger spatial coverage and water-fat separation for comprehensive aortocardiac assessment.
Does the MT-MACS technique provide comparable image quality and functional quantification to conventional 2D sequences in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=9)
No
Does the MT-MACS technique provide comparable image quality and functional quantification to conventional 2D sequences in healthy subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The refined MT-MACS technique provides comprehensive multi-contrast, phase-resolved, and water-fat imaging of the aortocardiac system with good agreement to conventional 2D sequences in healthy subjects.
PURPOSE: To extend the MR MultiTasking-based Multidimensional Assessment of Cardiovascular System (MT-MACS) technique with larger spatial coverage and water-fat separation for comprehensive aortocardiac assessment. METHODS: MT-MACS adopts a low-rank tensor image model for 7D imaging, with three spatial dimensions for volumetric imaging, one cardiac motion dimension for cine imaging, one respiratory motion dimension for free-breathing imaging, one T2-prepared inversion recovery time dimension for multi-contrast assessment, and one T2*-decay time dimension for water-fat separation. Nine healthy subjects were recruited for the 3T study. Overall image quality was scored on bright-blood (BB), dark-blood (DB), and gray-blood (GB) contrasts using a 4-point scale (0-poor to 3-excellent) by two independent readers, and their interreader agreement was evaluated. Myocardial wall thickness and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were quantified on DB and BB contrasts, respectively. The agreement in these metrics between MT-MACS and conventional breath-held, electrocardiography-triggered 2D sequences were evaluated. RESULTS: MT-MACS provides both water-only and fat-only images with excellent image quality (average score = 3.725/3.780/3.835/3.890 for BB/DB/GB/fat-only images) and moderate to high interreader agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa value = 0.727/0.668/1.000/1.000 for BB/DB/GB/fat-only images). There were good to excellent agreements in myocardial wall thickness measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] = 0.781/0.929/0.680/0.878 for left atria/left ventricle/right atria/right ventricle) and LVEF quantification (ICC = 0.716) between MT-MACS and 2D references. All measurements were within the literature range of healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The refined MT-MACS technique provides multi-contrast, phase-resolved, and water-fat imaging of the aortocardiac systems and allows evaluation of anatomy and function. Clinical validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=9). MT-MACS (MR Multitasking-based Multidimensional Assessment of Cardiovascular System) vs. Conventional breath-held, electrocardiography-triggered 2D MRI sequences was evaluated on Agreement in myocardial wall thickness and LVEF quantification between MT-MACS and 2D reference sequences. The MT-MACS technique provided multi-contrast and water-fat imaging with excellent image quality and demonstrated good to excellent agreement with conventional 2D references for myocardial wall thickness and LVEF quantification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: