Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of myocardial dyssynchrony on the effectiveness of pacing depending on the location of the right ventricular electrode.
Does right ventricular lead implantation in the middle and lower septal zone improve pacing efficiency and reduce myocardial dyssynchrony compared to apical placement in patients with complete AV block and preserved LVEF?
Does right ventricular lead implantation in the middle and lower septal zone improve pacing efficiency and reduce myocardial dyssynchrony compared to apical placement in patients with complete AV block and preserved LVEF?
Right ventricular lead placement in the middle and lower septum improves pacing efficiency and reduces myocardial dyssynchrony compared to apical placement in patients with complete AV block.
Septal RV pacing was associated with better efficiency and less dyssynchrony than apical; hypothesis-generating pending randomized trials in AV block.
Currently the electrophysiological treatment options have been considered to be the most effective for many patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, as well as in those with arrhythmias on the background of heart failure. Currently, the dependence of efficiency of the pacemakers on the location of the electrodes has been proven. In order to study the effect of a myocardial dysynchrony on the effectiveness of pacing depending on the location of the right ventricular electrode, an investigation has been performed. This study comprised the patients with a complete atrioventricular block, preserved ejection fraction of the left ventricle (more than 50 %), with no history of myocardial infarction, who were implanted with the two−chamber pacemaker. It has been established that the best results were achieved with a stimulation of the middle and lower septal zone of the right ventricle, the worst ones were obtained with a stimulation of its apex. It has been found that the dynamics of the magnitude of segmental strains and a global longitudinal strain coincided with the dynamics of other parameters of the pacemaker effectiveness, which indicated the pathogenetic value of myocardial dysynchrony in the progression of heart failure after implantation of the pacemaker. Therefore it could be concluded that the studying of myocardial mobility by determining a longitudinal strain for assessing the functional state of the myocardium and the effectiveness of pacing is highly advisable. It is emphasized that the use of the latest strains−dependent techniques for cardiac performance evaluation in the patients with bradyarrhythmia have a great potential to predict the development of chronic heart failure and to choose the optimal method of physiological stimulation of the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopyn et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: