Key result
High jugular venous pressure at rest or with inspiration was associated with a significantly increased risk of the composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (OR 5.06) compared to patients without high JVP.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether a simplified JVP assessment combined with Kussmaul's sign is useful for risk assessment across diverse HF patients, including HFrEF and HFpEF.
Does the presence of high jugular venous pressure at rest or with inspiration predict adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure?
Cohort (n=246)
No
Does the presence of high jugular venous pressure at rest or with inspiration predict adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure?
A simple visual assessment of jugular venous pressure at rest and during inspiration in the sitting position strongly predicts 1-year mortality and heart failure hospitalization in both HFrEF and HFpEF.
Simplifying the estimation of internal jugular venous pressure (JVP) as visible or not visible above the right clavicle in the sitting position has attracted attention for risk assessment in patients with heart failure (HF). It remains unclear whether this simple assessment, combined with its inspiration response known as Kussmaul's sign, is useful in patients with HF who vary in features such as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).This study consisted of 246 patients who were admitted for the management of HF. JVP was assessed before discharge and considered high if visible at rest. The inspiration response was also examined. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.One year after discharge, primary outcome events occurred in 91 patients (37%). The incidence of primary outcome was higher in patients with a high JVP at rest (odds ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-11.1; P = 0.0001) or with inspiration (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-16.4; P < 0.01) than in patients without high JVP conditions. These findings were similarly observed among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF (odds ratios, 3.53 and 6.76; 95% confidence intervals, 1.68-8.68 and 2.19-15.5; P = 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively) and in subgroup analysis stratified by baseline characteristics of the patients.A high JVP at rest and with inspiration as assessed by this simple, practical method may be useful for risk assessment in patients with HF, independent of baseline characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasai et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=246). High jugular venous pressure at rest or with inspiration vs. Absence of high jugular venous pressure was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (OR 5.06, 95% CI 2.31-11.1, p=<0.01). High jugular venous pressure at rest or with inspiration was associated with a significantly increased risk of the composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure (OR 5.06) compared to patients without high JVP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: