Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract In spite of important differences in structural response to near‐fault and far‐fault ground motions, this paper aims at extending well‐known concepts and results, based on elastic and inelastic response spectra for far‐fault motions, to near‐fault motions. Compared are certain aspects of the response of elastic and inelastic SDF systems to the two types of motions in the context of the acceleration‐, velocity‐, and displacement‐sensitive regions of the response spectrum, leading to the following conclusions. (1) The velocity‐sensitive region for near‐fault motions is much narrower, and the acceleration‐sensitive and displacement‐sensitive regions are much wider, compared to far‐fault motions; the narrower velocity‐sensitive region is shifted to longer periods. (2) Although, for the same ductility factor, near‐fault ground motions impose a larger strength demand than far‐fault motions—both demands expressed as a fraction of their respective elastic demands—the strength reduction factors R y for the two types of motions are similar over corresponding spectral regions. (3) Similarly, the ratio u m / u 0 of deformations of inelastic and elastic systems are similar for the two types of motions over corresponding spectral regions. (4) Design equations for R y (and for u m / u 0 ) should explicitly recognize spectral regions so that the same equations apply to various classes of ground motions as long as the appropriate values of T a , T b and T c are used. (5) The Veletsos–Newmark design equations with T a =0.04 s, T b =0.35 s, and T c =0.79 s are equally valid for the fault‐normal component of near‐fault ground motions. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Chopra et al. (Tue,) studied this question.