PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2006Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres153 citationsOpen Access

Ozone production from the 2004 North American boreal fires

View Full Paper
GPGabriele PfisterLEL. K. EmmonsPHPeter Hess

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We examine the ozone production from boreal forest fires based on a case study of wildfires in Alaska and Canada in summer 2004. The model simulations were performed with the chemistry transport model, MOZART‐4, and were evaluated by comparison with a comprehensive set of aircraft measurements. In the analysis we use measurements and model simulations of carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone (O 3 ) at the PICO‐NARE station located in the Azores within the pathway of North American outflow. The modeled mixing ratios were used to test the robustness of the enhancement ratio ΔO 3 /ΔCO (defined as the excess O 3 mixing ratio normalized by the increase in CO) and the feasibility for using this ratio in estimating the O 3 production from the wildfires. Modeled and observed enhancement ratios are about 0.25 ppbv/ppbv which is in the range of values found in the literature and results in a global net O 3 production of 12.9 ± 2 Tg O 3 during summer 2004. This matches the net O 3 production calculated in the model for a region extending from Alaska to the east Atlantic (9–11 Tg O 3 ) indicating that observations at PICO‐NARE representing photochemically well aged plumes provide a good measure of the O 3 production of North American boreal fires. However, net chemical loss of fire‐related O 3 dominates in regions far downwind from the fires (e.g., Europe and Asia) resulting in a global net O 3 production of 6 Tg O 3 during the same time period. On average, the fires increased the O 3 burden (surface −300 mbar) over Alaska and Canada during summer 2004 by about 7–9% and over Europe by about 2–3%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pfister et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2072cf55fc9dbe737803f4https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007695
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Regional and hemispheric impacts of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions on summertime CO and O 3 in the North Atlantic lower free troposphere2004 · 220 citations
  2. 2Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis2002 · 12,987 citations
  3. 3Fast‐response, high‐precision carbon monoxide sensor using a tunable diode laser absorption technique1987 · 349 citations
  4. 4Routine, Continuous Measurement of Carbon Monoxide with Parts per Billion Precision1994 · 76 citations
  5. 5The two‐dimensional diagnostic model for tropospheric OH: An uncertainty analysis1981 · 85 citations