Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The tolerance and the efficacy of the paclitaxel-vinorelbine-cisplatin combination (PVC regimen) was evaluated in 33 patients with anthracycline-resistant stage IV breast cancer, who had disease progression under anthracycline- or mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy. Fourteen (42%) and 19 (58%) patients had primary and secondary resistance to anthracyclines, respectively; 70% had visceral metastases. Patients received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) followed by paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) in a 3-hour infusion on day 1, and cisplatin (CDDP; 80 mg/m2) on day 2, in a 3-week schedule. A total of 208 chemotherapy courses were administered (median six courses per patient). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 13 patients (39%), seven of whom were hospitalized for neutropenic fever (5% of the courses). There was no toxic death. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients (6%) and grade 3 anemia in three patients (9%). Grade 2 and 3 neurosensory toxicity occurred in 11 patients (32%) and two patients (6%), respectively, and grade 3/4 fatigue was observed in four patients (12%). Two (6%) complete and 17 partial responses (52%) (total, 58%; 95% confidence interval, 42%-75%) were documented. Stable disease was observed in eight patients (24%) and progression in six patients (18%). The median duration of response was 6.5+ months. The median survival was 15+ months, and the 1-year survival was 67%. In conclusion, PVC regimen is an active and well-tolerated salvage chemotherapy in patients resistant to anthracycline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kourousis et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: