Key result
The Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students significantly improved undergraduate medical students' knowledge test scores (mean improvement 0.94; P<0.001) and confidence.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic undermined undergraduate anaesthetic teaching despite the vital role of the specialty against the pandemic.
Does the Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students improve knowledge and confidence among medical students?
Does the Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students improve knowledge and confidence among medical students?
A national online anaesthetic teaching programme significantly improved medical students' knowledge and confidence during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support national online teaching in medical curricula; leaves open need for controlled trials on clinical outcomes.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly undermined undergraduate anaesthetic teaching in spite of the vital role of the specialty against the pandemic. Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students (ANTPS) was designed to meet the evolving needs of undergraduates and tomorrow's doctor by standardising anaesthetic training, preparing for final exams and equipping competencies vital for doctors of all grades and specialties. Our Royal College of Surgeons England-accredited University-College-Hospital-affiliated programme consisted of six-biweekly sessions were delivered online by anaesthetic trainees. Prerandomised and postrandomised session-specific multiple-choice questions (MCQs) assessed students' improvement in knowledge. Anonymous feedback forms were provided to students after each session and 2 months following the programme. 3743 student feedback forms (92.2% of attendees) across 35 medical-schools were recorded. There was a mean improvement in test score (0.94±1.27, p<0.001). 313 students completed all six sessions. Based on 5-point Likert scale, students who completed the programme showed an improvement in their confidence in knowledge and skills to face common foundation challenges (1.59±1.12, p<0.001) and thus felt better prepared for life as junior doctors (1.60±1.14, p<0.001). With an increase in confidence in students to pass their MCQs, Observed Structured Clinical Examinations and case-based discussion assessments, 3525 students stated they would recommend ANTPS to other students. Unprecedented COVID-19 factors impacting training, positive student feedback and extensive recruitment, demonstrate that our programme is an indispensable learning resource which standardises anaesthetic undergraduate education nationally, prepares undergraduates for their anaesthetic and perioperative exams and lays strong foundations for implementation of clinical skills required by all doctors, to optimise training and patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wicks et al. (2022) studied Undergraduate medical education in anaesthetics (n=4,060). Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students (ANTPS) was evaluated on Improvement in test score (Mean improvement 0.94, p=<0.001). The Anaesthetic National Teaching Programme for Students significantly improved undergraduate medical students' knowledge test scores (mean improvement 0.94; P<0.001) and confidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: