Key result
A Delphi study of 27 consultant anaesthetists in Ireland achieved consensus on 74 items for an undergraduate medical curriculum, emphasizing a broader range of knowledge and skills.
A Delphi study identified 74 consensus items for an undergraduate medical curriculum in anaesthesia, emphasizing a broad range of knowledge and skills relevant to newly qualified doctors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports inclusion of broader anaesthesia competencies in medical curricula; leaves open international validation and outcome assessment.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anaesthesia is commonly taught to medical students. The duration and content of such teaching varies however and no consensus exists as to what constitutes an optimal curriculum. Anaesthetists possess the necessary knowledge and skills and operate in clinical settings suitable to provide training for medical undergraduates, especially in areas where deficiencies have been identified. This Delphi study was directed towards developing a consensus on an optimal anaesthesia, intensive care and pain medicine curriculum for medical undergraduates. METHODS: This Delphi survey consisted of three iterative rounds with feedback given at the start of each successive round in the form of the results of the previous round. The participants consisted of 27 consultant anaesthetists, chosen by the three Professors of anaesthesia in Ireland to be experts in undergraduate medical education. RESULTS: Thirty one consultant anaesthetists were chosen to participate in the study. Two consultants declined to participate. Two consultants were omitted from the first round in error and were not included in the remainder of the study. The response rate to the first round was 100%. Two hundred and nine individual items were included in the second questionnaire. 67% consultants responded to the second questionnaire and 59% to the third questionnaire. 74 Items achieved consensus level on completion of the study. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated support amongst respondents for an expanded role for anaesthetists in teaching medical students. An expanded teaching role for anaesthetists would take advantage of the large number of anaesthetists in Irish teaching hospitals, their enthusiasm for teaching, the frequency of patient-consultant proximity and the likely value of their teaching to student learning outcomes. The consensus reached by this study does not recommend a comprehensive anaesthesia curriculum. Rather, more emphasis has been placed on anaesthetists teaching a broader range of knowledge, skills and attitudes relevant to every newly qualified doctor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohan et al. (2009) studied Undergraduate medical education in anaesthesia (n=27). Delphi survey for curriculum development was evaluated on Consensus on items for an optimal anaesthesia, intensive care and pain medicine curriculum. A Delphi study of 27 consultant anaesthetists in Ireland achieved consensus on 74 items for an undergraduate medical curriculum, emphasizing a broader range of knowledge and skills.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: