This Delphi consensus provides standardized priorities to guide medical educators in reviewing and implementing anaesthesia curricula in Australian and New Zealand medical schools.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides curriculum priorities for medical student anaesthesia education; leaves open prospective validation of implementation and outcomes.
The role of anaesthetists has expanded and evolved to include critical care, perioperative and pain medicine and general clinical skills, as well as operating theatre-based clinical anaesthesia. Across Australia and New Zealand, these topics are taught to varying degrees, however no uniform curriculum or standardisation exists between universities. In this study, we used a Delphi technique to develop consensus-based priorities to guide medical educators when reviewing and implementing student anaesthesia curricula. A range of appropriate content has been defined, as well as details relating to duration, timing, teaching environment, faculty, feedback and assessment methods. Future enquiry to assess the efficacy of future and current teaching practices is needed to facilitate continued improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Overton et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: