Why the study?
Does an alternative calibration method improve the accuracy of the thrombin generation test in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate?
Does an alternative calibration method improve the accuracy of the thrombin generation test in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate?
An alternative calibration method for the thrombin generation test corrects the paradoxical parameter increases seen in patients taking dabigatran, allowing for accurate assessment of anticoagulant effect.
May enable accurate TGT monitoring on dabigatran; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
A new oral anticoagulant, dabigatran etexilate (DE, a prodrug of direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dabigatran), has been used clinically to prevent thrombosis. The assessment of dabigatran efficiency is necessary in some clinical cases, such as renal insufficiency, risk of bleeding, and drug interactions. However, a specific thrombin generation test (TGT) that is one of the most informative and sensitive to anticoagulant therapy (calibrated automated thrombinography (САТ)) shows a paradoxical increase of test parameters, such as endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin, in patients receiving DE. The paradoxical behaviour of ETP and peak thrombin in these patients in the presence of DTIs is mostly caused by a decrease in the activity of thrombin in the α2-macroglobulin-thrombin complex that is used as a calibrator in CAT. For a correct estimation of the TGT parameters in patient's plasma containing DTIs we proposed to use our previously described alternative calibration method that is based on the measurement of the fluorescence signal of a well-known concentration of the reaction product (7-amino-4-methylcoumarin). In this study, the validity of such approach was demonstrated in an ex vivo study in patients with knee replacement and two special patients with multiple myeloma, who received DE for thrombosis prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Грибкова et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: