Key result
A revised Duke treadmill score incorporating ST depression duration improved the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to the classical score (AUC 0.744 vs 0.626, p<0.001).
Why the study?
To evaluate whether adding ST depression duration could increase the value of the Duke treadmill score (DTS) in predicting obstructive CAD.
Does adding ST depression duration to the Duke treadmill score improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain and positive exercise electrocardiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=258)
No
Does adding ST depression duration to the Duke treadmill score improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain and positive exercise electrocardiography?
Adding ST depression duration to the Duke treadmill score significantly improves its diagnostic accuracy for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease.
Introduction Exercise electrocardiography (EET) is a safe and cost-effective method to predict the presence, prognosis, and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Various score models have been developed to increase predictive power of EET. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether adding ST depression duration could have an effect on increasing the value of Duke treadmill score (DTS) in predicting obstructive CAD.Methods In this single centred, cross-sectional study, we evaluated a total of 258 patients who presented with a complaint of chest pain and undergone coronary angiogram in result of a positive EET. DTS was calculated for all the patients. The new score-revised DTS- was calculated by adding total ST depression time to classical DS parameters. We compared area under the curve (AUC) of DTS and revised DTS by Delongi method.Results Mean age of the group was 58.43 ± 9.37, and 37.2% (n = 96) were female. Mean total ST-depression duration was 171.72 ± 91.43 msec in normal artery group,241.54 ± 118.11 msec in non-obstructive CAD group, and 281.26 ± 113.64 in obstructive CAD group.ST-depression duration in both exercise and recovery, and total ST depression duration were significantly higher in obstructive CAD group than non-obstructive and normal artery groups (p = 0.024, p = 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). Revised DTS had significantly higher predictive value of obstructive CAD compared to classical DS (AUC (95%CI): 0.744 vs. 0.626, p < 0.001). The AUC of DS was significantly lower than the new score (z-score:3.274, p = 0.011).Conclusion In conclusion, adding ST depression duration to DTS calculation is increasing the discriminative value of DTS to predict obstructive CAD. Benefits of EET within the context of the management of CAD is well-known, hence, it is clear that physicians may use revised DTS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çağlar et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in obstructive coronary artery disease (n=258). Revised Duke treadmill score (incorporating ST depression duration) vs. Classical Duke treadmill score was evaluated on Predictive value for obstructive CAD (Area under the curve) (p=<0.001). A revised Duke treadmill score incorporating ST depression duration improved the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to the classical score (AUC 0.744 vs 0.626, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: