Key result
Symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG had lower 7-year survival compared to those with normal resting ECGs.
Why the study?
Does the Duke treadmill score effectively risk-stratify overall mortality and cardiac death in symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG?
Cohort (n=2,405)
No
Does the Duke treadmill score effectively risk-stratify overall mortality and cardiac death in symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG?
The Duke treadmill score effectively risk-stratifies symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG, identifying a cohort with generally worse prognosis than those with normal resting ECGs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nonspecific ST-T abnormalities associated with lower survival in symptomatic patients; leaves open incremental value of Duke treadmill score.
CONTEXT: Exercise testing of patients with ST-T abnormalities on the resting electrocardiogram (ECG) is problematic because in the presence of pre-existing ST-T abnormalities, the exercise test is less specific for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The prognostic capability of the Duke treadmill score in patients with ST-T abnormalities vs those with normal findings on resting ECG has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic accuracy of the Duke treadmill score in patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities vs those with normal results on resting ECG. DESIGN: Inception cohort study with 7 years of follow-up. SETTING: Nuclear cardiology laboratory of a US referral center. PATIENTS: All symptomatic patients who underwent exercise thallium testing between 1989 and 1991,939 of whom had nonspecific ST-T abnormalities and 1466 of whom had normal findings on resting ECG. Exclusion criteria included congenital, valvular, or cardiomyopathic heart disease; prior coronary artery revascularization; resting ECG with secondary ST-T abnormalities; or missing data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of overall mortality and cardiac death for subjects classified by Duke treadmill score risk group. RESULTS: For the end point cardiac death, 7-year survival in the study population in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 97%, 92%, and 76%, respectively (P<.001). Compared with the control group, the study group had lower 7-year survival (94% vs 98%; P<.001), fewer low-risk patients (426 [45%] vs 811 [55%]; P<.001) with worse 7-year survival (97% vs 99%; P= .008), and more high-risk patients (49 [5%] vs 34 [2%];P<.001) with a nonsignificant trend toward worse 7-year survival (76% vs 93%; P= .36). CONCLUSIONS: The Duke treadmill score can effectively risk-stratify patients with ST-T abnormalities on the resting ECG. In classified risk categories, patients with ST-T abnormalities have a worse prognosis than those with normal results on resting ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennifer M.F. Kwok (1999) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG (n=2,405). Nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG vs. Normal findings on resting ECG was evaluated on 7-year survival (p=<.001). Symptomatic patients with nonspecific ST-T abnormalities on resting ECG had lower 7-year survival compared to those with normal resting ECGs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: