Why the study?
Do treadmill scores improve the diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant and severe coronary artery disease compared to ST-segment depression analysis alone in patients with unstable angina?
Do treadmill scores improve the diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant and severe coronary artery disease compared to ST-segment depression analysis alone in patients with unstable angina?
The ACC/AHA High-Risk Criteria and Duke Treadmill Score provide relevant diagnostic information for detecting significant and severe coronary artery disease beyond ST segment analysis alone in patients with unstable angina.
ACC/AHA criteria and Duke score may improve CAD detection over ST depression in unstable angina; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: There has been no clear consensus regarding the optimum definition of a high-risk exercise ECG test. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of several treadmill scores [American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) High-Risk Criteria for exercise testing, Duke Treadmill Score, Veterans Affairs and West Virginia Prognostic Score, ST/Heart Rate Index] with the ST-segment depression analysis in the detection of significant and severe coronary disease as determined by coronary angiography. METHODS: The study included a cohort of 248 consecutive patients admitted to hospital for unstable angina. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the ACC/AHA High-Risk Criteria and the ST depression > or =1 mm were 89.02 and 76.83%, respectively, for the detection of significant coronary artery disease, and 96.15 and 86.54% for the detection of severe coronary artery disease. The specificities of the Duke Treadmill Score and the ST depression > or=1 mm were 96.43 and 73.81%, respectively, for the detection of significant coronary artery disease, and 81.63 and 47.45% for the detection of severe coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA High-Risk Criteria and Duke Treadmill Score provided relevant diagnostic information not available from the ST segment analysis alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamargo et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: