Key result
In aspirin-treated STEMI patients receiving thrombolysis, LMWH compared with UFH reduced reinfarction (3.0% vs 5.2%; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.45-0.73; NNT=45).
Why the study?
Does unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin reduce reinfarction and death in aspirin-treated patients with STEMI receiving thrombolysis?
Meta-Analysis (n=25,280)
Randomized
Does unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin reduce reinfarction and death in aspirin-treated patients with STEMI receiving thrombolysis?
In STEMI patients treated with aspirin and thrombolysis, LMWH is superior to placebo and UFH for reducing reinfarction and death, though it increases the risk of major and intracranial bleeding.
Supports LMWH over UFH to reduce reinfarction in aspirin-treated STEMI with thrombolysis; confirms Level 1 meta-analytic evidence.
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the role of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with aspirin and thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of the randomized trials to assess the effect of UFH and LMWH on reinfarction, death, stroke, and bleeding. Fourteen trials involving a total of 25,280 patients were included (1239 comparing intravenous UFH versus placebo or no heparin; 16,943 comparing LMWH versus placebo; and 7098 comparing LMWH versus intravenous UFH). Intravenous UFH during hospitalization did not reduce reinfarction (3.5% versus 3.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.99) or death (4.8% versus 4.6%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.78) and did not increase major bleeding (4.2% versus 3.4%; OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.18) but increased minor bleeding (19.6% versus 12.5%; OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.43). During hospitalization/at 7 days, LMWH compared with placebo reduced the risk of reinfarction by approximately one quarter (1.6% versus 2.2%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; number needed to treat [NNT]=167) and death by &10% (7.8% versus 8.7%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; NNT=111) but increased major bleeding (1.1% versus 0.4%; OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.83 to 3.99; number needed to harm [NNH]=143) and intracranial bleeding (0.3% versus 0.1%; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 4.52; NNH=500). The reduction in death with LMWH remained evident at 30 days. LMWH compared with UFH during hospitalization/at 7 days reduced reinfarction by &45% (3.0% versus 5.2%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73; NNT=45), did not reduce death (4.8% versus 5.3%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13) or increase major bleeding (3.3% versus 2.5%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.72), but increased minor bleeding (22.8% vs 19.4%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.43). The reduction in reinfarction remained evident at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In aspirin-treated patients with STEMI who are treated with thrombolysis, intravenous UFH has not been shown to prevent reinfarction or death. LMWH given for 4 to 8 days compared with placebo reduces reinfarction by approximately one quarter and death by &10% and when directly compared with UFH reduces reinfarction by almost one half. These data suggest that LMWH should be the preferred antithrombin in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eikelboom et al. (2005) conducted a meta-analysis in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=25,280). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs. Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) was evaluated on Reinfarction (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.73). In aspirin-treated STEMI patients receiving thrombolysis, LMWH compared with UFH reduced reinfarction (3.0% vs 5.2%; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.45-0.73; NNT=45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: