In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratios

PURPOSE: To evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), precision, and accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T with the help of an in vitro model and to compare the results with data from two 1.5-T scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an identical setup of a laminar flow model and sequence parameters, measurements were done at one 3-T and at two 1.5-T systems. Precision, accuracy, and SNR were obtained for velocity encodings ranging from 55 up to 550 cm(-1). SNRs were calculated from the magnitude as well as the flow encoded images. RESULTS: Precision and accuracy for the in vitro flow model were similarly high in all scanners with no significant difference. For velocity encodings from 55 cm(-1) up to 550 cm(-1), the SNR in magnitude as well as phase encoded images of the 3-T measurements was approximately 2.5 times higher than the SNR obtained from the two 1.5-T systems. CONCLUSION: Even without optimization for the 3-T environment, flow measurements show the same high accuracy and precision as is known from clinical 1.5-T scanners. The superior SNR at 3 T will allow further improvements in temporal and spatial resolution. This will be of interest for small-size vessels like coronary arteries or for slow diastolic flow patterns.