Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ever wondered whether half the stuff in Nature is worth doing again? Or could be done again if it was worth it? The question of replication of scientific results is an important one, and we take the 4 July 2002 issue of Nature as a test case. The answers are fascinating and relevant to some of the latest innovations in science publishing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jim Giles (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: