Why the study?
Does intravenous disopyramide phosphate reduce early post-coronary artery ligation dysrhythmias and ST-segment elevation in anaesthetized dogs?
Does intravenous disopyramide phosphate reduce early post-coronary artery ligation dysrhythmias and ST-segment elevation in anaesthetized dogs?
Intravenous disopyramide reduces early ischemic ventricular dysrhythmias and ST-segment elevation in canine models but causes significant myocardial depression, warranting caution in subjects with compromised cardiac function.
May caution use in compromised hearts from myocardial depression; leaves open translation of antiarrhythmic effects from canine ischemia models.
1 The antidysrhythmic, haemodynamic and metabolic effects of intravenously administered disopyramide phosphate (1 to 5 mg/kg) have been studied in greyhounds, anaesthetized with trichloroethylene. 2 In doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg, disopyramide significantly reduced the ventricular dysrhythmias that occur in the initial 30-min period following acute coronary artery ligation. None of the disopyramide-treated animals developed ventricular fibrillations. 3 The metabolic consequences of coronary artery ligation, assessed by local coronary venous sampling from the ischaemic area, were not modified by disopyramide except that K+ egress was prevented. 4 There was evidence for substantial disopyramide-induced myocardial depression (decreased cardiac output and left ventricular dP/drmax with elevated ventricular filling pressure and pulmonary oedema and shunting) and it is suggested that great care be taken when the drug is administered intravenously in conditions where cardiac function is already compromised. Disopyramide also reduced myocardial blood flow. 5 In chloralose-anaesthetized mongrel dogs, disopyramide (2.5 mg/kg) significantly reduced the ST-segment elevation (assessed from epicardial recordings) that resulted from short (3 min) coronary artery occlusions. This could indicate a reduction in the extent and severity of myocardial injury or simply reflect decreased K+ efflux (since locally administered K+ itself increased ST-segment elevation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marshall et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: