Key result
This editorial discusses controversial issues in orthopaedic surgery education and practice without reporting primary clinical data.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Highlights ongoing debates in surgical education without altering current practice; leaves open the need for primary data to resolve.
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA J. Bernstein, University of Pennsylvania, 424 Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Email: [email protected] A note from the Editor-in-Chief: We are pleased to present to readers of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®the next "Not the Last Word." The goal of this section is to explore timely and controversial issues that affect how orthopaedic surgery is taught, learned, and practiced. We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments to[email protected]. The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph Bernstein (2022) reported an editorial. This editorial discusses controversial issues in orthopaedic surgery education and practice without reporting primary clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: