Key result
A 3-month yoga program significantly improved cardiac time intervals, including resting heart rate (between-group P=0.036) and diastolic time (P=0.02), compared to walking in elderly with high pulse pressure.
Why the study?
Does yoga training improve cardiac function measured by cardiac time intervals compared to walking-exercise in elderly individuals with increased pulse pressure?
RCT (n=60)
Open-label
parallel-group
Does yoga training improve cardiac function measured by cardiac time intervals compared to walking-exercise in elderly individuals with increased pulse pressure?
A 3-month yoga program is more effective than walking at improving diastolic function and cardiac time intervals in elderly patients with high pulse pressure.
Supports yoga over walking for diastolic intervals in elderly high-pulse-pressure patients; extends RCT evidence for mind-body exercise on cardiac function.
OBJECTIVE: Arterial aging along with increased blood pressure(BP) has become the major cardiovascular(CV) risk in elderly. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of yoga program and walking-exercise on cardiac function in elderly with increased pulse pressure (PP). METHODS: An open label, parallel-group randomized controlled study design was adopted. Elderly individuals aged ≥60 years with PP≥60mmHg were recruited for the study. Yoga (study) group (n=30) was assigned for yoga training and walking (exercise) group (n=30) for walking with loosening practices for one hour in the morning for 6days in a week for 3 months. The outcome measures were cardiac time intervals derived from pulse wave analysis and ECG: resting heart rate (RHR), diastolic time(DT), ventricular ejection time(LVET), upstroke time(UT), ejection duration index (ED%), pre-ejection period (PEP), rate pressure product (RPP) and percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP). RESULTS: The mean within-yoga group change in RHR(bpm) was 4.41 (p=0.031), PD(ms): -50.29 (p=0.042), DT(ms): -49.04 (p=0.017), ED%: 2.107 (p=0.001), ES(mmHg/ms): 14.62 (p=0.118), ET(ms): -0.66 (p=0.903), UT(ms): -2.54 (p=0.676), PEP(ms): -1.25 (p=0.11) and %MAP: 2.08 (p=0.04). The mean within-control group change in HR (bpm) was 0.35 (p=0.887), PD (ms): 11.15(p=0.717), DT (ms): 11.3 (p=0.706), ED%: -0.101 (p=0.936), ES (mmHg/ms): 0.75 (p=0.926), ET(ms): 2.2 (p=0.721), UT(ms):4.7(p=455), PEP (ms): 2.1(p=0.11), %MAP: 0.65 (p=0.451). A significant difference between-group was found in RHR (p=0.036), PD (p=0.02), ED% (p=0.049), LVET (p=0.048), DT (p=0.02) and RPP (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Yoga practice for 3 months showed a significant improvement in diastolic function with a minimal change in systolic function. Yoga is more effective than walking in improving cardiac function in elderly with high PP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patil et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in increased pulse pressure (n=60). Yoga program vs. Walking with loosening practices was evaluated on cardiac time intervals derived from pulse wave analysis and ECG. A 3-month yoga program significantly improved cardiac time intervals, including resting heart rate (between-group P=0.036) and diastolic time (P=0.02), compared to walking in elderly with high pulse pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: