Ecologic observational study examines glaucoma medication spending in Medicare beneficiaries, indicating price exposure has a stronger impact than usage levels.
Objective To examine whether socioeconomic differences in Medicare Part D glaucoma medication spending are more strongly associated with price exposure (spending per claim) than with utilization intensity. Design Ecologic observational study using state-year–level data. Participants Medicare Part D beneficiaries receiving glaucoma medications across 50 states and the District of Columbia from 2019 through 2023 (255 state-years). Methods We analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Part D Prescribers-by-Geography and Drug public use files. State-level socioeconomic context was measured using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) national rank and median household income (sensitivity analysis). Outcomes included inflation-adjusted spending per beneficiary and per claim, as well as utilization measures (claims and 30-day fills per beneficiary) and brand spending and claims shares. Multivariable linear regression models included year fixed effects and state-clustered standard errors. Main Outcome Measures Spending per beneficiary and spending per claim. Results Median spending per beneficiary was $403.81 (interquartile range [IQR], $359.74–$444.73), and median spending per claim was $104.22 (IQR, $89.49–$118.41). Higher median household income was associated with greater spending per beneficiary ($18.18 per $10,000; 95% CI, $1.30–$35.06) and per claim ($6.99; 95% CI, $1.95–$12.03). Higher ADI was associated with lower spending per claim, although estimates were imprecise (–$3.69 per 10-point increase; 95% CI, –$7.51 to $0.13). Utilization intensity varied minimally across socioeconomic strata (claims per beneficiary, 3.8–4.0), and neither ADI nor income was consistently associated with brand spending or claims share. Conclusions State-level socioeconomic context was associated with modest differences in glaucoma medication spending per claim, with minimal differences in utilization intensity. These findings suggest that socioeconomic variation in Medicare Part D glaucoma drug spending is more consistent with differences in price exposure than with differences in volume of use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: