Key result
A nurse practitioner-led evidence-based protocol safely excluded deep vein thrombosis, with a 6-month venous thromboembolism incidence of 1.04% (95% CI 0.41-2.65%) in the negative cohort.
Why the study?
Does a nurse practitioner emergency department-based evidence-based protocol safely exclude deep vein thrombosis in outpatients with suspected DVT?
Observational (n=625)
Does a nurse practitioner emergency department-based evidence-based protocol safely exclude deep vein thrombosis in outpatients with suspected DVT?
A nurse-led evidence-based protocol using the Wells score, D-dimer, plethysmography, and ultrasound can safely exclude DVT in emergency department outpatients, with a low 6-month VTE complication rate of 1.04%.
Supports NP-led ED DVT exclusion protocols; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical validity of a nurse practitioner emergency department-based service for investigating outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: A prospective management study was undertaken to investigate the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment in patients who were negative for testing after application of an evidence-based protocol. The protocol involved a nurse assessment using the Wells pretest score followed by investigations tailored to the risk category (variable combinations of strain gauge plethysmography, D-dimer and ultrasound). The main outcome assessed was the venothromboembolic complication rate in patients deemed to have deep vein thrombosis excluded by the protocol. RESULTS: A total of 625 consecutive patients were evaluated between March 2003 and January 2007. Of these, 435 were eligible and 190 were ineligible. Four patients in the negative cohort were confirmed to have venous thromboembolism on follow-up. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the 6-month follow-up period was therefore 1.04% (95% CI 0.41% to 2.65%). CONCLUSION: The evidence-based protocol used in this study can reliably exclude deep vein thrombosis in an outpatient population when applied as part of a nurse-based evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewar et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Suspected deep vein thrombosis (n=625). Nurse practitioner emergency department-based evidence-based protocol was evaluated on Venothromboembolic complication rate in patients deemed to have deep vein thrombosis excluded by the protocol (95% CI 0.41-2.65). A nurse practitioner-led evidence-based protocol safely excluded deep vein thrombosis, with a 6-month venous thromboembolism incidence of 1.04% (95% CI 0.41-2.65%) in the negative cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: