Key result
Outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis was safe but associated with a 2.7% rate of proven pulmonary emboli (95% CI 0.74-9.3%) and suboptimal follow-up and screening arrangements.
Observational (n=214)
Outpatient management of selected DVT patients is generally safe but highlights gaps in follow-up and thrombophilia screening.
May support selective outpatient DVT care; leaves open optimized follow-up and screening in prospective trials.
Objectives For emergency department (ED) patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated as outpatients, to determine treatment duration, complications and follow-up arrangements, in particular thrombophilia screening. Methods Explicit, retrospective medical record review of patients with an ED discharge diagnosis of DVT over a three-year period. Data collected included demographics, location of DVT, duration of treatment, complications, hospital admission, mortality, follow-up arrangements and referral for thrombophilia screening. Main outcomes were the duration of treatment, rate of complications and requirement for hospital admission, follow-up arrangements and referral for thrombophilia screening for patients treated as outpatients. Results Two hundred and fourteen patients with DVT were identified, of whom 74 [35%] were treated as outpatients. For this group, the median duration of treatment was eight days. There was one death from advanced neoplasia, two proven pulmonary emboli (PE) [2.7%, 95% CI 0.74–9.3%] and one suspected PE [1.4%, 95% CI 0.24–7.3%]. One patient had a recurrence of DVT within three months [1.4%, 95% CI 0.24–7.3%]. Few patients received specialist follow-up [25/74, 34%]. In 20 cases [27%], thrombophilia screening was neither performed nor recommended, despite no obvious cause for the DVT. Conclusion Outpatient treatment of selected DVT is safe, although there is a small incidence of non-fatal PE. Follow-up and screening arrangements were sub-optimal in the study sample and treatment duration was long. An ambulatory care model with direct physician control is recommended to improve follow-up arrangements, monitor service performance and ensure that the service evolves with new evidence and processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paes et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Deep vein thrombosis (n=214). Outpatient management was evaluated on Duration of treatment, rate of complications, hospital admission, follow-up arrangements, and thrombophilia screening referral. Outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis was safe but associated with a 2.7% rate of proven pulmonary emboli (95% CI 0.74-9.3%) and suboptimal follow-up and screening arrangements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: