Key result
Sybr Green qPCR detects enterovirus in ~4% of rural water samples while TaqMan detects none.
Why the study?
Rural communities often rely on surface and groundwater of unknown microbial quality, and enteric viruses are major causes of waterborne disease outbreaks.
Observational (n=160)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.4% vs 0%
Enterovirus is present in groundwater sources in rural Brazilian communities, and detection methods vary in sensitivity and environmental interference.
Method sensitivity varies for enterovirus detection in rural groundwater; leaves open optimal protocols and health risk evaluation.
Individuals in rural communities often obtain water from surface and groundwater sources, where the microbial quality is often unknown. Enteric viruses are among the main pathogenic microorganisms responsible for waterborne disease outbreaks. Thus, the objective of this work was to search for enterovirus in water samples from 25 rural communities. For this, 160 water samples were collected. Detection and quantification of the enterovirus (EV) were performed through molecular tests using the two main amplification reagents for qPCR. The prevalence of EV was identified in 4.4% (7/160) of the samples when Sybr Green® was used, all in groundwater sources. Additionally, EV was found in 9.7% of shallow tubular wells, 3.8% of deep tubular wells, 4.3% of shallow dug wells and 5.9% of spring water. When using TaqMan®, there was no amplification of the EV cDNA. Conclusions: Sybr Green®, being a more accessible reagent, has a greater predilection for molecular tests, but the study showed that Taqman® could suffer less interference from environmental samples, resulting in more reliable values of viral quantification. In this context, the detection of EV in groundwater can help in monitoring the virus in this source, in addition to helping managers of these communities in decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bordoni et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Enterovirus contamination in water (n=160). Sybr Green® qPCR vs. TaqMan® qPCR was evaluated on Detection of enterovirus. Enterovirus was detected in 4.4% of rural water samples using Sybr Green® qPCR, whereas no amplification occurred using TaqMan®.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: