Key result
Novel multilevel implementation strategy targets key barriers to depression screening and care in CHD.
Why the study?
Depression leads to poor outcomes in CHD, but despite guidelines recommending screening and treatment, few patients receive optimal care.
What are the barriers to depression screening and treatment in patients with coronary heart disease, and how can a multilevel implementation strategy be designed to promote guideline adoption?
What are the barriers to depression screening and treatment in patients with coronary heart disease, and how can a multilevel implementation strategy be designed to promote guideline adoption?
Applying behavioral and implementation science provides a structured method to systematically identify barriers and build a tailored, multi-level strategy for improving depression care in patients with coronary heart disease.
Provides blueprint for addressing CHD depression barriers; leaves open whether iHeart DepCare improves screening or outcomes in practice.
BACKGROUND: Depression leads to poor health outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Despite guidelines recommending screening and treatment of depressed patients with CHD, few patients receive optimal care. We applied behavioral and implementation science methods to (1) identify generalizable, multilevel barriers to depression screening and treatment in patients with CHD and (2) develop a theory-informed, multilevel implementation strategy for promoting guideline adoption. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of barriers to depression screening and treatment in patients with CHD (ie, medications, exercise, cardiac rehabilitation, or therapy) comprising data from 748 study participants. Informed by the behavior change wheel framework and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, we defined multilevel target behaviors, characterized determinants (capability, opportunity, motivation), and mapped barriers to feasible, acceptable, and equitable intervention functions and behavior change techniques to develop a multilevel implementation strategy, targeting health care systems/providers and patients. RESULTS: We identified implementation barriers at the system/provider level (eg, Capability: knowledge; Opportunity: workflow integration; Motivation: ownership) and patient level (eg, Capability: knowledge; Opportunity: mobility; Motivation: symptom denial). Acceptable, feasible, and equitable intervention functions included education, persuasion, environmental restructuring, and enablement. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies included learning collaborative, audit, feedback, and educational materials. The final multicomponent strategy (iHeart DepCare) for promoting depression screening/treatment included problem-solving meetings with clinic staff (system); educational/motivational videos, electronic health record reminders/decisional support (provider); and a shared decision-making (electronic shared decision-making) tool with several functions for patients, for example, patient activation, patient treatment selection support. CONCLUSIONS: We applied implementation and behavioral science methods to identify implementation barriers and to develop a multilevel implementation strategy for increasing uptake of depression screening and treatment in patients with CHD as a use case. The multilevel implementation strategy will be evaluated in a future hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reuter et al. (2022) studied Coronary heart disease and depression (n=748). iHeart DepCare multi-level implementation strategy was evaluated on Identification of implementation barriers and development of a multi-level strategy for guideline adoption. A theory-informed, multilevel implementation strategy (iHeart DepCare) was developed to address system, provider, and patient barriers to depression screening and treatment in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: