Key result
Tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved the control of total cholesterol (-0.1 vs +0.4 mmol/L, p=0.01), LDL cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure at one year post-myocardial infarction compared to traditional care.
Why the study?
Does tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation improve risk factor control in post-AMI patients compared to traditional care?
Observational (n=217)
No
Does tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation improve risk factor control in post-AMI patients compared to traditional care?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.1% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=0.01
May support tailored nurse-led rehab for post-MI risk factor control; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation improves prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), however, the optimal method of implementation is unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of individually-tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation on patient outcomes. METHOD: This single-centre retrospective observational study included 217 patients (62 ± 9 years, 73% men). All patients attended cardiac rehabilitation including at least two follow-up consultations with a nurse. Patients receiving traditional care (n = 105) had a routine cardiologist consultation, while for those receiving tailored care (n = 112) their need for a cardiologist consultation was individually evaluated by the nurses. Regression analysis was used to analyse risk factor control and hospital readmissions at one year. RESULTS: Patients in the tailored group achieved better control of total cholesterol (- 0.1 vs + 0.4 mmol/L change between baseline (time of index event) and 12-14-month follow-up, (p = 0.01), LDL cholesterol (- 0.1 vs + 0.2 mmol/L, p = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (- 2.1 vs + 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Active smokers, at baseline, were more often smoke-free at one-year in the tailored group [OR 0.32 (0.1-1.0), p = 0.05]. There was a no significant difference in re-admissions during the first year of follow-up. In the tailored group 60% of the patients had a cardiologist consultation compared to 98% in the traditional group (p < 0.001). The number of nurse visits was the same in both groups, while the number of telephone contacts was 38% higher in the tailored group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation programme can improve risk factor management in post-AMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelsen et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=217). Tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation vs. Traditional care was evaluated on Change in total cholesterol between baseline and 12-14-month follow-up (p=0.01). Tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved the control of total cholesterol (-0.1 vs +0.4 mmol/L, p=0.01), LDL cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure at one year post-myocardial infarction compared to traditional care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: