We perform a likelihood analysis of the recently released BOOMERanG and MAXIMA data, allowing for the possibility of a time-varying fine-structure constant. We find that in general these data prefer a value of {α} that was smaller in the past (which is in agreement with measurements of {α} from quasar observations). However, there are some interesting degeneracies in the problem which imply that strong statements about {α} cannot be made using this method until independent accurate determinations of Ωbh² and H₀ are available. We also show that a preferred lower value of α comes mainly from the data points around the first Doppler peak, whereas the main effect of the high-l data points is to increase the preferred value for Ωbh² (while also tightening the constraints on Ω₀ and H₀). We comment on some implications of our results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avelino et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: