Key result
Current in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo model systems used to study preeclampsia, ischemic/reperfusion injury, and heart failure were compared to guide future cardiovascular disease research.
Why the study?
Preeclampsia pathophysiology remains poorly understood due to animal model variability and unpredictability, and novel models are needed to study subsequent maternal and offspring cardiovascular disease.
This review highlights the need for novel experimental models that better mimic the complex pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and heart failure in patients with preeclampsia.
Existing models may inadequately capture preeclampsia-CVD interplay; leaves open development of improved systems for future research.
Preeclampsia is a multifactorial cardiovascular disorder diagnosed after 20 weeks of gestation that is the leading cause of death for both mothers and babies in pregnancy. The pathophysiology remains poorly understood due to variability and unpredictability of disease manifestation when studied in animal models. After preeclampsia, both mothers and offspring have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including myocardial infarction or heart attack and heart failure (HF). Myocardial infarction is an acute myocardial damage that can be treated through reperfusion, however, that therapeutic approach leads to ischemic/reperfusion injury (IRI) often leading to HF. In this review, we compared the current in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo model systems used to study preeclampsia, IRI and HF. Future studies aiming at evaluating CVD in preeclampsia patients could benefit from novel models that better mimic the complex scenario described in this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming et al. (2021) conducted a review in Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Disease. Model systems (in vivo, in vitro, ex vivo) was evaluated. Current in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo model systems used to study preeclampsia, ischemic/reperfusion injury, and heart failure were compared to guide future cardiovascular disease research.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: