Why the study?
Does a unipolar stimulus induce reentry via virtual electrodes in a simulated myocardial sheet?
Does a unipolar stimulus induce reentry via virtual electrodes in a simulated myocardial sheet?
The study demonstrates that reentry induction depends on the close proximity of S2-induced excited and deexcited areas, with adjacent nonexcited areas available for propagation.
Virtual electrode reentry mechanisms warrant caution in stimulus design; extends anisotropic tissue models but leaves open clinical translation.
INTRODUCTION: Recent experimental evidence demonstrates that a point stimulus generates a nonuniform distribution of transmembrane potential (virtual electrode pattern) consisting of large adjacent areas of depolarization and hyperpolarization. This simulation study focuses on the role of virtual electrodes in reentry induction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We simulated the electrical behavior of a sheet of myocardium using a two-dimensional bidomain model with straight fibers. Membrane kinetics were represented by the Beeler-Reuter Drouhard-Roberge model. Simulations were conducted for equal and unequal anisotropy ratios. S1 wavefront was planar and propagated parallel or perpendicular to the fibers. S2 unipolar stimulus was cathodal or anodal. With regard to unequal anisotropy, for both cathodal and anodal stimuli, the S2 stimulus negatively polarizes some portion of membrane, deexciting it and opening an excitable pathway in a region of otherwise unexcitable tissue. Reentry is generated by break excitation of this tissue and subsequent propagation through deexcited and recovered areas of myocardium. Figure-of-eight and quatrefoil reentry are observed, with figure-of-eight most common. Figure-of-eight rotation is seen in the direction predicted by the critical point hypothesis. With regard to equal anisotropy, reentry was observed for cathodal stimuli only at strengths > -95 A/m. CONCLUSION: The key to reentry induction is the close proximity of S2-induced excited and deexcited areas, with adjacent nonexcited areas available for propagation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LINDBLOM et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: