Pulse Explorar nav.journalClub Debates Tendencias Investigadores Revistas

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Inicio Explorar nav.journalClub Tendencias

⌘+K

June 22, 2006Open Access

Is restricted randomisation necessary?

CHCatherine HewittDepartment of Medical Sciences DTDavid TorgersonUniversity of York

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

needed to ensure that promises to provide appropriate education, and not just training, are actually kept.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Hewitt et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2082ed23a8c2fe81f8940f https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1506

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Compartir

Ver artículo completo

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Randomisation in the SYMPHONY trial2000 · 6 citations
2Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice;2003 · 240 citations
3Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized Clinical Trials2005 · 116 citations
4Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial2001 · 307 citations
5Every-other-day interferon beta-1b versus once-weekly interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis: results of a 2-year prospective randomised multicentre study (INCOMIN)2002 · 549 citations

Is restricted randomisation necessary? | Synapse