Key result
Dual antiplatelet therapy and low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduced early neurological deterioration compared to aspirin alone (4.12% and 3.11% vs 14.81%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy or low-molecular-weight heparin reduce early neurological deterioration compared to aspirin alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
RCT (n=1,467)
Open-label
Computer-derived random sequences with sealed envelopes
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy or low-molecular-weight heparin reduce early neurological deterioration compared to aspirin alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
In patients with acute ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy or low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduced the incidence of early neurological deterioration and early recurrent ischemic stroke compared to aspirin alone, without increasing bleeding risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dual antiplatelet therapy or low-molecular-weight heparin over aspirin in acute ischemic stroke; confirms benefit in RCT for preventing early deterioration.
Background and PurposezzDual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with clopidogrel and aspirin has been shown to confer greater protection against early neurological deterioration (END) and early recurrent ischemic stroke (ERIS) than aspirin alone in patients who have experienced an acute ischemic stroke. However, few studies have compared the effects of anticoagulation therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), DAT, and aspirin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke (n=1,467). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) or Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs. Aspirin alone (200 mg daily) was evaluated on Incidence of early neurological deterioration (END) within 10 days after admission (p=<0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy and low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduced early neurological deterioration compared to aspirin alone (4.12% and 3.11% vs 14.81%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: