Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Accurate simulation of landfalling typhoons is essential for urban resilience in the densely populated Pearl River Delta. Using Super Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) as a case study, this paper evaluates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model through a contribution analysis designed to disentangle the roles of surface layer, planetary boundary layer (PBL), urban canopy model (UCM), and eddy-coefficient/diffusion closure parameterizations in wind-hazard prediction. Model results are validated against observations at the Hong Kong Observatory headquarters (HKO) and King’s Park (KP) stations, demonstrating that the hierarchy of physical controls is strongly metric-dependent. Substantial and structured spread is found among the tested configurations. Controlled comparisons show that PBL selection is the primary driver of variability in peak timing and high-wind persistence, whereas surface-layer formulation and diffusion closure exert secondary but systematic influences by shifting distributional centers and reshaping variability and upper tails. Urban canopy effects are comparatively weaker in aggregate but become more apparent during the impact and recovery phases. Overall, the results confirm that no single parameterization is consistently optimal across all metrics and motivate a multi-objective physics-selection strategy, in which multi-physics ensembles are used to better represent uncertainty in wind-event duration and associated loading risks in complex urban environments.
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: