Key result
A systematic review identified 39 large prospective UK cohort studies evaluating traditional and novel risk factors for coronary heart disease in predominantly healthy subjects.
Systematic Review
This systematic review highlights the contributions and gaps of 39 prospective UK cohort studies in understanding coronary heart disease epidemiology and risk factors.
Provides comprehensive UK cohort inventory for CHD risk; leaves open pooled evaluation of novel versus traditional factors.
BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies have made enormous contributions to our understanding of coronary heart disease (CHD) epidemiology in the UK. However, identification of cohorts and dissemination of key characteristics and results can be haphazard, and it is difficult to identify studies which are at the planning stage. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of cohort studies by searching MEDLINE and relevant websites and consulting key individuals. We included all large prospective UK cohort studies that focused on the development of CHD in predominantly healthy subjects. RESULTS: The MEDLINE search retrieved 1558 hits and we identified 39 cohorts that met inclusion criteria. 'Early' cohorts were important in defining the major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, physical activity and body mass index. Prospective cohort studies have subsequently appraised potentially important novel risk factors including nutritional status, genetic determinants, haemostatic factors, lipid sub-fractions, psychosocial factors and the 'life course' perspective. Psychosocial factors have been relatively neglected, as have women, ethnic minorities and the elderly. Key methodological issues include minimizing losses to follow up, standardized measurements, quality assurance systems, change in risk factors over time, residual confounding, regression dilution bias, detection of non-fatal events, measurement of quality of life, and generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The current and proposed prospective UK cohorts have sufficient power potentially to determine the importance of many traditional and newer CHD risk factors on cardiovascular risk in men, women and even ethnic minorities. However, secure financial support and hence sustainability will remain essential to maximize long-term benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Critchley et al. (2003) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease. Traditional and novel CHD risk factors was evaluated on Identification of prospective UK cohort studies. A systematic review identified 39 large prospective UK cohort studies evaluating traditional and novel risk factors for coronary heart disease in predominantly healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: