Key result
Pre-exercise electrocardiograms acquired via wearable sensors in 51 healthy athletes established preliminary reference values, revealing significant reductions in heart-rate variability and prolonged QRS duration compared to standard resting ECGs.
Why the study?
No reference values have been proposed for electrocardiograms of athletes acquired with wearable sensors during the pre-exercise phase immediately before training sessions to support prevention of sport-related sudden cardiac death.
Observational (n=51)
No
Establishing preliminary reference values for pre-exercise ECGs using wearable sensors can help identify athletes at risk for sport-related sudden cardiac death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against using preliminary wearable ECG values for athlete screening; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
Aim: The aim of this study is to support large-scale prevention programs fighting sport-related sudden cardiac death by providing a set of electrocardiographic features representing a starting point in the development of normal reference values for the pre-exercise phase. Background: In people with underlying, often unknown, cardiovascular abnormalities, increased cardiovascular load during exercise can trigger sport-related sudden cardiac death. Prevention remains the only weapon to contrast sport-related sudden cardiac death. So far, no reference values have been proposed for electrocardiograms of athletes acquired with wearable sensors in the pre-exercise phase, consisting of the few minutes immediately before the beginning of the training session. Objective: To perform an initial investigation of athletes’ electrocardiograms acquired by wearable sensors during the pre-exercise phase. Methods: The analyzed electrocardiograms, acquired through BioHarness 3.0 by Zephyr, belong to 51 athletes (Sport Database and Cycling Database of the Cardiovascular Bioengineering Lab of the Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy). Preliminary values consist of interquartile ranges of six electrocardiographic features which are heart rate, heart-rate variability, QRS duration, ST level, QT interval, and corrected QT interval. Results: For athletes 35 years old or younger, preliminary values were [72;91]bpm, [26;47]ms, [85;104]ms, [-0.08;0.08]mm, [326;364]ms and [378;422]ms, respectively. For athletes older than 35 years old, preliminary values were [71;94]bpm, [16;65]ms, [85;100]ms, [-0.11;0.07]mm, [330;368]ms and [394;414]ms, respectively. Conclusion: Availability of preliminary reference values could help identify those athletes who, due to electrocardiographic features out of normal ranges, are more likely to develop cardiac complications that may lead to sport-related sudden cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romagnoli et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy athletes (n=51). Pre-exercise electrocardiography via wearable sensors vs. Standard 12-lead resting ECG reference values was evaluated on Pre-exercise electrocardiographic features (HR, HRV, QRS duration, ST level, QT interval, QTc interval). Pre-exercise electrocardiograms acquired via wearable sensors in 51 healthy athletes established preliminary reference values, revealing significant reductions in heart-rate variability and prolonged QRS duration compared to standard resting ECGs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: