Key result
Machine learning algorithms using smartwatch-derived data predicted two classes of rating of perceived exertion with an overall accuracy of 84.8% in runners.
Why the study?
Rating of perceived exertion has shortcomings like underreporting and cannot be monitored continuously or automatically throughout training sessions.
Can machine learning algorithms using smartwatch-derived data accurately predict classes of rating of perceived exertion in runners?
Observational (n=12)
Can machine learning algorithms using smartwatch-derived data accurately predict classes of rating of perceived exertion in runners?
Machine learning algorithms can accurately predict classes of perceived exertion in runners using continuous smartwatch data, offering a potential method to automatically individualize training prescriptions.
May support individualized runner training via smartwatch data; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a subjective load marker and may assist in individualizing training prescription, particularly by adjusting running intensity. Unfortunately, RPE has shortcomings (e.g., underreporting) and cannot be monitored continuously and automatically throughout a training sessions. In this pilot study, we aimed to predict two classes of RPE ( ≤ 15 "Somewhat hard to hard" on Borg's 6-20 scale vs. RPE > 15 in runners by analyzing data recorded by a commercially-available smartwatch with machine learning algorithms. Twelve trained and untrained runners performed long-continuous runs at a constant self-selected pace to volitional exhaustion. Untrained runners reported their RPE each kilometer, whereas trained runners reported every five kilometers. The kinetics of heart rate, step cadence, and running velocity were recorded continuously ( 1 Hz ) with a commercially-available smartwatch (Polar V800). We trained different machine learning algorithms to estimate the two classes of RPE based on the time series sensor data derived from the smartwatch. Predictions were analyzed in different settings: accuracy overall and per runner type; i.e., accuracy for trained and untrained runners independently. We achieved top accuracies of 84 . 8 for the whole dataset, 81 . 82 for the trained runners, and 86 . 08 for the untrained runners. We predict two classes of RPE with high accuracy using machine learning and smartwatch data. This approach might aid in individualizing training prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Runners (n=12). Smartwatch-derived data and machine learning algorithms was evaluated on Prediction of two classes of rating of perceived exertion (≤ 15 vs > 15). Machine learning algorithms using smartwatch-derived data predicted two classes of rating of perceived exertion with an overall accuracy of 84.8% in runners.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: