Key result
A Gaussian Process regression model accurately estimated the rating of perceived exertion from heart rate (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.52) after adjusting for age, resting heart rate, central arterial pressure, body fat rate, and BMI.
Why the study?
Rating of perceived exertion can serve as a more convenient and economical alternative to heart rate for exercise intensity control, but the influence of various physiological and demographic factors on their relationship requires investigation to develop predictive models.
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
A Gaussian Process regression model can accurately estimate the rating of perceived exertion from heart rate by adjusting for age, resting heart rate, central arterial pressure, body fat rate, and BMI.
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) can serve as a more convenient and economical alternative to heart rate (HR) for exercise intensity control. This study aims to explore the influence of factors, such as indicators of demographic, anthropometric, body composition, cardiovascular function and basic exercise ability on the relationship between HR and RPE, and to develop the model predicting RPE from HR. 48 healthy participants were recruited to perform an incrementally 6-stage pedaling test. HR and RPE were collected during each stage. The influencing factors were identified with the forward selection method to train Gaussian Process regression (GPR), support vector machine (SVM) and linear regression models. Metrics of R2, adjusted R2 and RMSE were calculated to evaluate the performance of the models. The GPR model outperformed the SVM and linear regression models, and achieved an R2 of 0.95, adjusted R2 of 0.89 and RMSE of 0.52. Indicators of age, resting heart rate (RHR), Central arterial pressure (CAP), body fat rate (BFR) and body mass index (BMI) were identified as factors that best predicted the relationship between RPE and HR. It is possible to use GPR model to estimate RPE from HR accurately, after adjusting for age, RHR, CAP, BFR and BMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=48). Heart rate and demographic/physiological factors (age, RHR, CAP, BFR, BMI) was evaluated on Prediction of Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) from Heart Rate (HR) (R2 0.95). A Gaussian Process regression model accurately estimated the rating of perceived exertion from heart rate (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.52) after adjusting for age, resting heart rate, central arterial pressure, body fat rate, and BMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: