Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compare the performance of GaN HEMT devices based on the established Ga-face technology and the emerging N-face technology. Starting from a state-of-the-art N-face device, we obtain the analogous Ga-face layout imposing the constraint of the same channel charge in both structures, and then, we simulate both the configurations with our full-band cellular Monte Carlo simulator, which includes the full details of the band structure and the phonon spectra. Moreover, we define a modeling approach based on gate-to-2-D electron gas distance and capacitance discussions, which allows a fair comparison between the N- and Ga-face technologies. Full direct current and RF simulations were performed and compared with available experimental data for the N-face device in order to calibrate the few adjustable simulator parameters. Our simulations indicate that N-face GaN HEMTs exhibit improved RF performance with respect to Ga-face devices. Furthermore, the use of an AlN layer in N-face devices results in a reduced alloy scattering and offers a strong back-barrier electron confinement to mitigate short-channel effects, thus improving the cutoff frequency for highly scaled devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerra et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: