Key result
Coupled pacing in a canine model of acute atrial fibrillation and cardiac dysfunction increased myocardial efficiency by markedly increasing cardiac work with only moderate increases in energy consumed.
Why the study?
Does coupled pacing improve cardiac efficiency during acute atrial fibrillation with or without cardiac dysfunction in a canine model?
Does coupled pacing improve cardiac efficiency during acute atrial fibrillation with or without cardiac dysfunction in a canine model?
Coupled pacing improves myocardial efficiency in a canine model of acute atrial fibrillation and cardiac dysfunction by increasing cardiac work more than energy consumption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cautious translation to acute AF patients needed; extends efficiency data in canine models but remains hypothesis-generating.
Coupled pacing (CP), a method for controlling ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF), consists of a single electrical stimulation applied to the ventricles after each spontaneous activation. CP results in a mechanical contraction rate approximately one-half the rate during AF. Paired stimulation in which two electrical stimuli are delivered to the ventricles has also been proposed as a therapy for heart failure. Although paired stimulation enhances contractility, it greatly increases energy consumption. The primary hypothesis of the present study is that CP improves cardiac function during acute AF without a similar increase in energy consumption because of the reduced rate of ventricular contractions. In a canine model, CP was applied during four stages: sinus rhythm (SR), acute AF, cardiac dysfunction (CD), and AF in the presence of cardiac dysfunction. The rate of ventricular contraction decreased in all four stages as the result of CP. In addition, we determined the changes in external cardiac work, myocardial oxygen consumption, and myocardial efficiency in the each of four stages. CP partially reversed the effects of AF and CD on external cardiac work, whereas myocardial oxygen consumption increased only moderately. In all stages but SR, CP increased myocardial efficiency because of the marked increases in cardiac work compared with the moderate increases in total energy consumed. Thus this pacing therapy may be a viable therapy for patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2004) studied Acute atrial fibrillation with or without cardiac dysfunction. Coupled pacing vs. Baseline states (sinus rhythm, acute AF, cardiac dysfunction, and AF with cardiac dysfunction) was evaluated on Changes in external cardiac work, myocardial oxygen consumption, and myocardial efficiency. Coupled pacing in a canine model of acute atrial fibrillation and cardiac dysfunction increased myocardial efficiency by markedly increasing cardiac work with only moderate increases in energy consumed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: