Key result
Acute application of coupled pacing in addition to CRT significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional CRT alone (35% vs 30%, P=0.0002).
Why the study?
Does coupled pacing added to cardiac resynchronization therapy improve acute myocardial function in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm?
Does coupled pacing added to cardiac resynchronization therapy improve acute myocardial function in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm?
Acute application of coupled pacing in addition to CRT significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output without worsening ventricular synchrony in heart failure patients.
Should not yet change CRT practice; leaves open whether coupled pacing confers durable benefit in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Coupled pacing (CP), which consists of an additional beat delivered after ventricular refractory period, has been proposed to reduce ventricular rate and increase ventricular contractility. We hypothesized that CP may be added to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to improve CRT effect in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS: The study included 20 consecutive HF patients in sinus rhythm referred for CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation (baseline left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 27 ± 6%, baseline QRS duration 149 ± 33 ms, age = 63 ± 11 years). CP associated with CRT (CRT + CP) was delivered during CRT-D implantation from the right and left ventricular leads simultaneously. Echocardiography data were collected at baseline, during CRT and CRT + CP to assess changes in LVEF, cardiac output (CO), longitudinal global strain assessed by speckle tracking, and LV dyssynchrony (opposing wall delay using tissue Doppler imaging). RESULTS: Compared to the conventional CRT, heart rate (HR) markedly decreased during CRT + CP (79 ± 20 beats/min vs 51 ± 8 beats/min, P < 0.0001) and was associated with a significant increase in LVEF (30 ± 8% vs 35 ± 8%, P = 0.0002) and peak of longitudinal global strain (-6 ± 2% vs -8 ± 2%, P < 0.0001). Importantly, during CRT + CP, CO increased (3.8 ± 1.0 L/min vs 4.4 ± 1.4 L/min, P = 0.004) and cardiac synchronicity remained unchanged (38 ± 24 ms for CRT alone vs 27 ± 18 ms for CRT + CP, P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: In sinus rhythm HF patients, acute CP application in addition to CRT decreases HR and contributes to myocardial contractility and CO improvement without deleterious impact on ventricular synchronicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brémont et al. (2014) studied Heart failure (n=20). Cardiac resynchronization therapy plus coupled pacing (CRT + CP) vs. Conventional CRT was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.0002). Acute application of coupled pacing in addition to CRT significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional CRT alone (35% vs 30%, P=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: