Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY An eight-factor non-orthogonal taxonomy is suggested for the categorization of engineering design problems or situations, together with scaling in relation to these factors. It is suggested that, in view of the broad scope of design activity, discussions on design require such a framework to avoid foundering on cross-purposes, and that such a categorization may allow correlations between problems and classes of likely solution methods. Discussion in this journal of the notions contained in this paper is strongly encouraged, so that refinements may occur and so that a broad background of usage of the taxonomy may start to accumulate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Frost (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: