Case study demonstrates enhanced constraint compliance and reduced iteration time using small language models in generative design, indicating improved traceability.
While traditional Quality Function Deployment (QFD) remains effective at translating stakeholder requirements into engineering characteristics, its static formulation is poorly suited to contemporary generative design, where rapid synthesis can bypass requirement traceability and constraint governance. This paper proposes an Adaptive QFD (AQFD) framework for generative engineering design in which a domain-specialised Small Language Model (SLM) re-instruments QFD as an active governance mechanism. The framework comprises three phases: (1) Insight, where the SLM transforms stakeholder inputs, standards, and design documentation into a requirement-constraint knowledge graph (RCKG) for requirement extraction, prioritisation, and conflict identification; (2) Integration, where an Adaptive House of Quality(AHoQ) derives traceable, constraint-aware engineering targets; and (3) Ideation, where these targets become structured generative conditions guiding concept synthesis within a governed design space. When validated requirement evidence, priorities, regulations, or constraints change, affected RCKG/AHoQ elements and downstream target bundle are recomputed. In an aerospace monitor-console redesign case study, the proposed approach reduced human-active iteration time and increased concept-level constraint compliance and expert-rated engineering plausibility relative to a prompt-only generative baseline. The findings suggest that re-instrumented QFD can integrate concept generation into requirement-driven engineering workflows while preserving traceability and explicit concept-level validation boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: