Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
I have performed a search for young low-mass stars and brown dwarfs (BDs) in 2 regions encompassing a total area of 4 deg² in the Taurus star-forming region, discovering 15 new members of Taurus. In addition, I present 7 new members outside of these areas from the initial stage of a survey of all of Taurus. These 22 objects exhibit spectral types of M4. 5-M9. 25 and masses of 0. 3-0. 015 Mₛun according to the theoretical evolutionary models of Baraffe and Chabrier, 7 of which are likely to be BDs. Emission in H (alpha), He I, Ca II, O I, and S II and excess emission in optical and near-IR bands among some of these objects suggest the presence of accretion, outflows, and circumstellar disks. The results from the 4 deg² survey have been combined with previous studies of Taurus to arrive at an IMF for a total area of 12. 4 deg². As in the previous IMFs for Taurus, the updated IMF peaks at a higher mass (0. 8 Mₛun) than the mass functions in IC 348 and Orion (0. 1-0. 2 Mₛun). Meanwhile, the deficit of BDs in Taurus appears to be less significant (x1. 4-1. 8) than found in earlier studies (x2) because of a slightly higher BD fraction in the new IMF for Taurus and a lower BD fraction in the new spectroscopic IMF for the Trapezium from Slesnick and coworkers. The spatial distribution of the low-mass stars and BDs discovered in the two new survey areas closely matches that of the more massive members. Thus, on the degree size scales (~3 pc) probed to date, there is no indication that BDs form through ejection. Finally, I draw attention to the misleading nature of the recent claim of Barrado y Navascues to have "confirmed" a sample of late-type objects as members of Taurus, which were already conclusively determined to be bonafide members in the discovery paper by Briceno and coworkers.
K. L. Luhman (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: