Key result
SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit broad cross-neutralizing antibodies against sarbecoviruses, significantly augmented by boosters.
Why the study?
Previous coronavirus outbreaks highlight the need for proactive countermeasures against future pandemics, prompting investigation into whether SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit cross-neutralizing antibodies against zoonotic sarbecoviruses.
Does SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit cross-neutralizing antibodies against zoonotic sarbecoviruses in humans?
Cross-Sectional (n=162)
Does SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit cross-neutralizing antibodies against zoonotic sarbecoviruses in humans?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit broad cross-neutralizing antibodies against zoonotic sarbecoviruses, which are further enhanced by booster doses, providing potential countermeasures for future outbreaks.
The outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2 highlight the need for countermeasures to prevent future coronavirus pandemics. Given the unpredictable nature of spillover events, preparing antibodies with broad coronavirus-neutralizing activity is an ideal proactive strategy. Here, we investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination could provide cross-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against zoonotic sarbecoviruses. We evaluated the cross-neutralizing profiles of plasma and monoclonal antibodies constructed from B cells from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescents and vaccine recipients; against sarbecoviruses originating from bats, civets, and pangolins; and against SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. We found that the majority of individuals with natural infection and vaccination elicited broad nAb responses to most tested sarbecoviruses, particularly to clade 1b viruses, but exhibited very low cross-neutralization to SARS-CoV-1 in both natural infection and vaccination, and vaccination boosters significantly augmented the magnitude and breadth of nAbs to sarbecoviruses. Of the nAbs, several exhibited neutralization activity against multiple sarbecoviruses by targeting the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) and competing with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding. SCM12-61 demonstrated exceptional potency, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 0.001–0.091 μg/mL against tested sarbecoviruses; while VSM9-12 exhibited remarkable cross-neutralizing breadth against sarbecoviruses and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants, highlighting the potential of these two nAbs in combating sarbecoviruses and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. Collectively, our findings suggest that vaccination with an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, in combination with broad nAbs against sarbecoviruses, may provide a countermeasure for preventing further sarbecovirus outbreaks in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination (n=162). SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination vs. Pre-pandemic healthy donors and pre-vaccination individuals was evaluated on Cross-neutralizing antibody responses against zoonotic sarbecoviruses. SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicited broad cross-neutralizing antibody responses to most tested sarbecoviruses, particularly clade 1b viruses, which were significantly augmented by booster vaccination.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: