Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) has been proposed as an alternative to the mean‐variance Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This paper considers the testability of the APT and points out the irrelevance for testing of the approximation error. We refute Shanken's objections, including his assertion that Roll's critique of the CAPM is applicable to the APT. We also explain the testability of the APT on subsets, and we explore the relationship between the APT and the CAPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dybvig et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: