Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Use of point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care has increased. There is a need for high-quality field evaluation of POCT before deployment can be considered. METHOD: A POCT system for C-reactive protein was evaluated in a routine general practice setting. The standard laboratory method was a dry slide method based in a routine hospital laboratory. RESULTS: Scatterplots for both venous and capillary blood POCT system results versus the standard laboratory assay produced correlation coefficients of greater than 0.96. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 95% of venous and capillary POCT results fell within +/-10 mg/L of the mean value with no clinically significant difference from laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT system performed reliably in a routine general practice setting with satisfactory performance against an accepted laboratory method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seamark et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: