Key result
Among 102 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty, suboptimal results occurred in 17.65%, and combining Wilkins and Sutaria scores better predicted procedural outcomes.
Why the study?
Does an integrated echocardiographic scoring approach better predict immediate procedural outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty compared to individual scoring systems?
Observational (n=102)
Does an integrated echocardiographic scoring approach better predict immediate procedural outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty compared to individual scoring systems?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining the Wilkins score with the Sutaria score and commissural area ratio provides a better prediction of immediate procedural outcomes for percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty than individual scoring systems.
BACKGROUND: Present echocardiographic scoring systems for percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) have limitations, and no scoring system is significant determinant of procedural outcome. In this study, we assess the relationship between various echocardiographic parameters and scoring systems with immediate outcomes and test an integrated approach by combining Wilkins score with other parameters. METHODS: One hundred two patients who had undergone PMV were included in this prospective observational study. Preprocedural mitral valve morphology was assessed and categorized using Wilkins score, Sutaria scoring system, and Nunes quantitative scoring system. RESULTS: Optimal PMV results were obtained in 84 patients (82.35%), and suboptimal PMV results were obtained in 18 patients (17.65%). Using Nunes scoring system, suboptimal PMV results were obtained in 9 (37.5%) patients of high-risk group (n=24), 8 (13.8%) of intermediate-risk group (n=58), and one (5%) patient of low-risk group (n=20). Using Wilkins scoring system, in patients having score>8 (n=16) suboptimal results were obtained in 5 (31.7%) and in patients having score<8 (n=86) suboptimal results were obtained in 13 (15.1%). Using Sutaria scoring system, in patients having score 3 to 4 (low risk, n=68) suboptimal results were obtained in 6 (8.8%), and in patients having score 0-2 (high risk, n=34) suboptimal results were obtained in 12 (35.3%) patients. CONCLUSION: All echocardiographic scores have significant limitations, and an integrative approach is mandatory. Combining traditional Wilkins score with Sutaria score and commissural area ratio better predicts procedural outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gajjala et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (n=102). Echocardiographic scoring systems (Wilkins, Sutaria, Nunes) was evaluated on Immediate procedural outcomes (optimal vs suboptimal PMV results). Among 102 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty, suboptimal results occurred in 17.65%, and combining Wilkins and Sutaria scores better predicted procedural outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: